G'day Guys,

Welcome to the Speedo Forum.

If you are a guest, you can only see a small portion of the forum. Members like posting their speedo selfies so I don't like that to be 100% public. However, joining is free.

If you are a new member, you need to email me your username so I can manually activate your account. This is a pain (for you and me) but it is the only way I've been able to keep the spam bots from ruining the forum. My email address is: DaveEvans@SpeedoFetish.com

This forum is free and I don't allow any advertising (except my own sites), if you would like to donate please click the link above, all donations go towards the hosting and maintenance of the forum for everyone to enjoy.

Dave 'Speedo' Evans
Webmaster/Speedo Enthusiast

Um, WTF?

General speedo discussion - questions/ideas.

Moderator: DaveSpeedoEvans

Post Reply
SwimBriefEnthusiast

Um, WTF?

Post by SwimBriefEnthusiast » Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:01 pm

No stupid sign is stopping me wearing a speedo wherever the f*** I want!
Attachments
tumblr_m0ius8xKat1rpy633o1_500.png
tumblr_m0ius8xKat1rpy633o1_500.png (215.36 KiB) Viewed 4367 times

California Dolphin

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by California Dolphin » Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:02 pm

Speedos are the most environmentally friendly swim suit.

Less spandex & lycra = less environmental impact!!! :mrgreen:

CD

Beach4WDer

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Beach4WDer » Fri Mar 09, 2012 4:43 am

I wonder if the "guys" referred to in that sign also agree that "chicks" shouldn't be seen in bikinis? :shock:

tannedbum

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by tannedbum » Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:18 am

I'll bet some asshole showed up in a white Aussiebum or something that showed off shaft or way too much detail at a family pool. After reading some of the posts on speedo boards, it seems some guys wear speedos as an excuse to expose themselves in public and take little or no consideration for others (mainly kids) around pools or at the beach. A normal speedo is not going to be rejected. I used to manage a large hotel and on occasion someone would show up almost totally exposing themselves with too skimpy suits or transparent suits. We had to impose a rule of male suits no less then 2" on side and white suits had to be lined - including board shorts. Woman had to have breasts covered totally, and bottoms covering total public area.(since women's bikini bottoms are more acceptable due to their plumbing, sides not dictated) Thongs were not permitted on anyone. We never enforced the rules unless there was a question of taste or exposure at a pool that families used. I recall one of the regulars that broke the rules all the time but his 1" or less bikini was a dark color, fit well and no detail or cleavage showed. She wore a thong but she knew not to bend from the waist and it wasn't too skimpy - top or bottom.
Basically, what I am saying that no matter what the situation there always seems to be a couple assholes that want to go in and screw it up for everybody. Whenever I see a guys posting about a transparent suit that is having fun flaunting his exposure, I just pray he has the common sense to do it at private pools or on a gay or secluded non family beach. Guys like that ruin it for all of us that just like to wear a speedo as a swim suit - not as an add we're desperate to get noticed. It also adds to the stigma that speedos = gay.
Maybe I am just old enough to have reached the conclusion that the phrase "there is a time and place for everything" is true.

PeterSF

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by PeterSF » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:06 pm

What intrigues me is the figure wearing a speedo is overweight, the boardies one is slim. What sort of characterisation is that?

speedoboi

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by speedoboi » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:28 pm

PeterSF wrote:What intrigues me is the figure wearing a speedo is overweight, the boardies one is slim. What sort of characterisation is that?
The idiot is stereotyping.

JohnC

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by JohnC » Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:09 pm

wow - whoever put that up must be a real zealot.

I'm sure I would take the sign down if I saw it!

Justin88

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Justin88 » Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:16 pm

Isn't Surfers Paradise in Australia?? Things really are changing there. :-[

speedoboi

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by speedoboi » Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:33 pm

Justin88 wrote:Isn't Surfers Paradise in Australia?? Things really are changing there. :-[
I doubt this was put up by the State Government of Surfers Paradise.

budgybloke

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by budgybloke » Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:40 am

Gotta laugh. Some prude wasted precious minutes of their life making that sign. What a goose! :lol:

It wouldn't stop me - although I do agree with choosing an appropriate speedo for each location. Fortunately I have quite a few styles to choose from!

No true beach-goer in Australia should want to ban them. It's our birthright! Come on Australia - let's not become ultra-conservative. It's too boring.

Justin88

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Justin88 » Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:00 am

speedoboi wrote:
Justin88 wrote:Isn't Surfers Paradise in Australia?? Things really are changing there. :-[
I doubt this was put up by the State Government of Surfers Paradise.
Its obviously a homemade sign. when I said "things," I meant some peoples attitudes....

Justin88

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Justin88 » Sun Mar 11, 2012 11:06 am

budgybloke wrote:
No true beach-goer in Australia should want to ban them. It's our birthright! Come on Australia - let's not become ultra-conservative. It's too boring.
I was sort of thinking the same way on this.... I was kind of shocked that it was in Australia. Florida maybe....but not Australia!! An Australian invented the Speedo!!!

PeterSF

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by PeterSF » Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:59 pm

speedoboi wrote:
PeterSF wrote:What intrigues me is the figure wearing a speedo is overweight, the boardies one is slim. What sort of characterisation is that?
The idiot is stereotyping.

Yes - stereotyping us! Incorrectly.

JohnC

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by JohnC » Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:44 pm

I hope the sign is gone and this one is there now
Attachments
no%20bordies.jpg
no%20bordies.jpg (52.62 KiB) Viewed 3119 times
no%20boardies%203.jpg
no%20boardies%203.jpg (40.31 KiB) Viewed 3119 times

SwimBriefEnthusiast

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by SwimBriefEnthusiast » Sun Mar 11, 2012 6:50 pm

Eh, on second thought, let 'em have Surfers beach. It's a crowded dump anyhow! There are kilometers of better beach on either side of it!

Justin88

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Justin88 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:56 am

JohnC wrote:I hope the sign is gone and this one is there now
Very cool post john!!

Justin88

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Justin88 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:14 am

SwimBriefEnthusiast wrote:Eh, on second thought, let 'em have Surfers beach. It's a crowded dump anyhow! There are kilometers of better beach on either side of it!
Never been there. (but I want to visit australia some time.) Just looking at what what came up on the google search, it looked like it was overdeveloped.

speedoboi

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by speedoboi » Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:13 am

JohnC wrote:I hope the sign is gone and this one is there now
I heard that at swimming pools in France, you can't wear board shorts for hygiene reasons. I know in some clubs you can't use the pools if you wear board shorts.

California Dolphin

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by California Dolphin » Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:06 pm

speedoboi wrote:
JohnC wrote:I hope the sign is gone and this one is there now
I heard that at swimming pools in France, you can't wear board shorts for hygiene reasons. I know in some clubs you can't use the pools if you wear board shorts.
I believe in the 1930s, the inventors of the modern swimming pool (Adolph Keifer and Roy Jacuzzi) did experiments to determine the best way to keep the filtration system clean & hygenic and these were their recommendations:

Urinate in the restrooms then take a thorough shower before getting in the pool.
Wear minimal clothing -IE- trunks for men and bras & bikinis for women - or swim in the nude if permissible. The latter was the better of the options.

I kid you not, these are the results of a certified scientific analysis!!! :mrgreen:

CD

Justin88

Re: Um, WTF?

Post by Justin88 » Sat Mar 17, 2012 6:57 pm

California Dolphin wrote:or swim in the nude if permissible. The latter was the better of the options.

I kid you not, these are the results of a certified scientific analysis!!!
My father went to college in the seventies. He had to take swimming in gym. They swam naked.

Post Reply