Like Rozelle, I like to preserve my modesty in public.

Moderator: DaveSpeedoEvans
Let me be clear, I'm being a devil's advocate here trying to stimulate thought. Not trying to hurt any ones feelings or say I am right or any one is wrong. One comment was wearing a Speedo and "preserving modesty". To me, wearing a Speedo is wearing the absolute minimum one can legally get away with to expose maximum skin. Preserving modesty would be loose shorts with more coverage. Consider this scenario:Bullseye wrote:Hey openfly,
I get your point about the fetish thing, and you are right that even serious swimmers wouldn't be hanging out on this forum if there wasn't a certain level of that involved. But there seems to be a recurring theme on this forum that speedos should be normal swimwear for men, openly embraced and accepted by the public and then...at the same time.. many members freely admit their main reason for wearing them is to show off their junk. Most people don't want to see a guy showing off his boxers with his pants on the ground (and they could care less about his motivation for doing it), and most people don't want to see a guy displaying his assets in an unlined speedo (and they could care less about his motivation for doing it). So I apologize if I came across as "holier than thou". I was responding to the statement "why do we wear speedos? To show more." IF that is why the majority of us wear speedos, then speedos, like sagging, will never be accepted by the general public as appropriate or normal.