Page 1 of 1

Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:13 am
by Scottiebum
Looking at websites that have pictures of speedos I have found they often have other lycra pictures.

The photos of wrestlers show young guys in their late teens/early twenties in lycra singlets, some with underwear, some with jocks, but most with nothing under a single layer of lycra.

They roll about the floor in close contact and then stand up, aroused, clearly pointing in all directions, leaving nothing to the imagination!

American football kit and cycling skin suits are similar.

I find it confusing that this is acceptable to the guys wrestling and the spectators, but there is still an abhorrence of guys wearing speedos that are normally double lined and tight enough to hold `things` in place.
:?

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:21 am
by electric2010
I'd say many things are overlooked in the name of team sports.

The only place no one bats an eye, is if a guy is wearing cycling shorts. They seem to be accepted without any question.

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Sat Nov 14, 2015 6:22 pm
by rockman748
you also have to look at the fact that in diving, water polo, and sometimes swimming speedos are worn. They just appear "odd" to people who are not used to them in those settings.

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:01 am
by blackspeedo30
The other thing I find strange is guys wearing running tights like Under Armor and then wearing a pair of shorts over-top. Why can we not wear them on their own, it defeats the purpose of the tights. On the other hand, Women wear yoga pants and leggings without putting shorts over them.

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:52 am
by Scottiebum
blackspeedo30 wrote:The other thing I find strange is guys wearing running tights like Under Armor and then wearing a pair of shorts over-top. Why can we not wear them on their own, it defeats the purpose of the tights. On the other hand, Women wear yoga pants and leggings without putting shorts over them.
Yeah, agree totally with that!

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 12:02 pm
by packedspeedo
It is for some reason very weird. I don't mind walking around in my bike shorts, or in a speedo at the gym/pool. But wearing running tights, which covers more of my body, around town seems odd.

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Thu Nov 19, 2015 3:35 pm
by Scottiebum
packedspeedo wrote:It is for some reason very weird. I don't mind walking around in my bike shorts, or in a speedo at the gym/pool. But wearing running tights, which covers more of my body, around town seems odd.
I don`t tend to wear running tights. When I have my cycle tights on I have no worries about walking about around in them if I stop on my cycle to go into a shop or cafe.

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2015 4:08 am
by karlos
Sorry you lost me at...
Scottiebum wrote:They roll about the floor in close contact and then stand up, aroused, clearly pointing in all directions, leaving nothing to the imagination!
now just replace the singlet's with speedos...

Re: Singlets - Yes, Speedos - No

Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 5:27 pm
by mikesk40
love wear tights here