So, as a every good university undergraduate does, Google research was recruited to get the facts on how big peoples wangs are.
Remember, because it's from Google then it must be true! Just like everybodies personal research of penis on porn gives an accurate representation, especially with such a significant sample size.
I suspect the difference is the research considers small as outside of the 95 percentile range, where men compare to typical in the showers, gym, porn stars and donkeys.British Journal of Urology International,
Almost half of men in the study (45%) believed they had a small penis - yet the researchers reported that small penis size was actually rare.
But for a big wang thats still a big range of big wangs!The Nature-published paper included a table that listed previous findings on penis dimensions (see previous reports on penile dimensions).
Of the 16 studies they cited, from various countries, the earliest was carried out over a hundred years ago and published in 1899. They all arrived at similar average penis lengths:
Flaccid lengths ranged around 7 to 10 centimeters (2.8 to 3.9 inches)
Flaccid circumferences ranged around 9 to 10 centimeters (3.5 to 3.9 inches)
Erect lengths ranged around 12 to 16 centimeters (4.7 to 6.3 inches)
Erect circumference (only one previous study) was around 12 centimeters (4.7 inches).
So, how exactly is a the wang measured... all of these years I thought measuring was from the tip of him down to the ground. My over inflated ego was destroyed badly when I saw the ISO standard for measuring penis. I'm guessing all of these upcoming engineers had to come up with some thesis to work on while chilling at the university bar and decided that standard penis measuring protocols would be a shit load of fun. From previous engineer thesis', a "shit load" is exactly 100m3 which is an overwhelming amount of fun!
Anyway, here is what they came up with.
Remember... tip to the pubic bone, NOT tip to the ground!
So, the BJU took some measurements - Makes you wonder, how did someone become the chief wang measurer and how did that person get their subject into a "suitable" state.
No doubt chief wang measurer did with the sheer passion and commitment for the job that Monica once had!
and so this is what the tape measure said in the research by the BJU, and this is why I think the researchers definition or small is different to others.
from another study - note, this does not use the standard ISO wang measuring protocol, this one uses an "under the old fella" protocol so a slightly different average.
and this also explains why the researchers give a range of what's normal rather than an average measurement.
So here it is...
I have to say, I really am surprised as these measurements are coming up at least 10" shorter than what my extensive porn sample shows! But what about the rest... are the lads out there built like a door knob or like a chop stick or maybe even like a 13.12cm can of Milo.A King's College London study published in the British Journal of Urology International found the average penis length – when erect – is just over five inches, or 13cm. The team was looking to find out what was "normal" in terms of length and circumference as it could help provide counselling for men concerned about it.
The scientists used 17 studies with measurements of over 15,500 men to determine average sizes when flaccid was 9.16cm in length and 9.31cm in circumference. Erect averages 13.12cm in length and 11.66cm in circumference.
But we all "know" that some races are hung like Rasputin but most happen to not be from the Congo, so of that normal range, who's at the upper and who's at the lower range of normal, not that it really matters.In terms of girth, the average circumference of a flaccid penis turned out to be 9.31 cm (3.66 inches), and 11.66 cm (4.59 inches) for an erect one.
Furthermore, those at extreme ends of the spectrum were found to be much less common. For example, only 5 men out of every 100 have an erect penis longer than 16 cm (6.3 inches).
But back to the researchers at the Uni bar... here is what their findings in the bathroom were:
Please note that this bit of research was just out of interest rather than looking for any consequential outcome from it. That's what all good research is about.
